<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<!-- name="generator" content="pyblosxom/1.3.2 2/13/2006" -->
<!DOCTYPE rss PUBLIC "-//Netscape Communications//DTD RSS 0.91//EN" "http://my.netscape.com/publish/formats/rss-0.91.dtd">

<rss version="0.91">
<channel>
<title>Rustybear Blog  Apr 2008</title>
<link>http://www.rustybear.com/cgi-bin/pyblosxom.cgi</link>
<description>Rustybear Blog</description>
<language>en</language>
<item>
  <title>Why we go to school</title>
  <link>http://www.rustybear.com/cgi-bin/pyblosxom.cgi/other/why-go-to-school.html</link>
  <description><![CDATA[
<p>
In 1861, one William Cory, a Master at Eton, made the following observation:
</p>
<p>
"You are not engaged so much in acquiring knowledge as in making mental
efforts under criticism. A certian amount of knowledge you can indeed with
average faculties acquire so as to retain; nor need you regret the hours that
you have spent on much that is forgotten, for the shadow of lost knowledge at
least protects you from many illusions. But you go to a great school, not for
knowledge so much as for arts and habits; for the habit of attention, for the
art of expression, for the art of assuming at a moment's notice a new
intellectual posture, for the art of entering quickly into another person's
thoughts, for the habit of submitting to censure and refutation, for the art
of indicating assent or dissent in graduated terms, for the habit of regarding
minute points of accuracy, for the habit of working out what is possible in a
given time, for taste, for discrimination, for mental courage and mental
soberness. Above all, you go to a great school for self-knowledge."
</p>
<p>
This was actually a test question that I was asked to write about in a
class on International Law at George Washington University. It was a terrific
class that I still remember today and kudos to the instructor, David A.
Peterson, for encouraging us to think in new ways.
</p>

]]></description>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
